We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Time Bar and Benefitting from One's Own Wrong - Perspectives from Common Law and Chinese Law

10 March 2011

Projects (Engineering and Construction)

Picture a common scenario.  A project is delayed.  The Contract provides for the deduction of liquidated damages, which the Employer decides to impose.  The Contractor argues that the Employer should grant an extension of time and should be liable for extra costs.  In reply, the Employer relies on the Contract which required the Contractor to give notice within a specific period, failing which the Contractor would be deprived of its entitlement to extra time and costs.  Given that the Contractor had failed to give the requisite notice, the Employer states that the Contractor's claim is "time barred".  However, this may mean that the Employer profits as a result of its own breach of the Contract.


This article compares the judicial attitude in Common Law jurisdictions as well as in the PRC regarding the above issue.  Practical tips will be given at the end of this article.


Loading data