We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Stanford v. Roche: Highlighting the Importance of Best Practices for Employee Assignments

21 April 2011

IP Alert

On February 28, 2011, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Case No. 09-1159, wherein the parties sparred over the scope of a federal contractor university's statutory right to elect to retain title to a "subject invention" under the Bayh-Dole Act, 35 U.S.C. §§ 200-212. This update summarizes the Justices' commentary during oral argument and provides thoughts about best practices regardless of how the Court ultimately rules.



Read "Stanford v. Roche: Highlighting the Importance of Best Practices for Employee Assignments: Highlighting the Importance of Best Practices for Employee Assignments"

The team

Loading data