We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Judicial review of mergers in the EU

Summer/Fall 2013

The Antitrust Bulletin
The European Commission plays the most prominent role in European merger review, and judicial review of Commission decisions is rare. Despite this, European courts have an essential function in the merger review system in the European Union, both as guarantors of procedural rights and as a vector for the development of the law. This article discusses the procedural aspects of this judicial review, such as when an application can be brought, by whom, and against which decisions, and specific procedures such as interventions, interim relief, expedited procedures, and appeals. We also address the substance of the European courts’ review, in particular on which grounds a Commission decision can be challenged. The article furthermore discusses the consequences of judgments, including the possibility of obtaining damages. We conclude by proposing a possible avenue to improve the process.
Loading data