We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Indefinite Leave Not Reasonable Accommodation Under New York State Law, But May Be Required Under Broader City Law

23 October 2013

Employment Alert

On October 10, 2013, the New York Court of Appeals held that New York employers are not required to provide indefinite leave as an accommodation under the state disability discrimination law, but that they may be required to do so under the broader New York City law. In Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo, S.p.A., the state’s highest court affirmed a lower court order dismissing a disability discrimination claim under the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL) by Giuseppe Romanello against his former employer, Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. However, the court reversed the lower court’s dismissal of Romanello’s claim under the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), finding that this claim may be viable under the broader protections of the City law. The dissent, however, argued that the complaint had sufficiently pled a claim even under the NYSHRL because it alleged that the employer failed to engage in an interactive process with the plaintiff before terminating his employment.

Read More: Indefinite Leave Not Reasonable Accommodation Under New York State Law, But May Be Required Under Broader City Law

The team

Loading data