We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Court Allows FTC to Move Forward in "Common Carrier" Exemption Case

Mark W. Brennan

Mark W. Brennan,

Washington, D.C.

08 April 2015
Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Edward M. Chen denied AT&T Mobility’s motion to dismiss the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC's) October 2014 complaint alleging that AT&T engaged in unfair and deceptive practices in connection with its retail mobile broadband data services. AT&T argued that its status as a common carrier makes it exempt from enforcement of the FTC Act. The court disagreed. At issue is the scope of the common carrier exemption.
Court Allows FTC to Move Forward in "Common Carrier" Exemption Case

The FTC’s two-count complaint alleged that AT&T’s throttling program was unfair because it changed the terms of customers’ unlimited data plans while those customers were still under contract, and AT&T failed to adequately disclose the nature of the throttling program to consumers who renewed their unlimited data plans.

AT&T argued that its status as a communications common carrier means that it is exempt from key provisions in the FTC Act, while the FTC argued that the exemption is not tied to the "status" of an entity but rather the activities conducted by the entity—and the court agreed.

During the pendency of this proceeding, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) reclassified retail mobile broadband data services from non–common carrier “information services” to common carrier “telecommunications services.”  The court disagreed with AT&T’s argument that once the FCC’s Order becomes effective, the FTC will no longer have jurisdiction to pursue this case, noting that the FCC's Order by its express terms is prospective and will not deprive the FTC of any jurisdiction over past alleged misconduct.

Having survived AT&T’s motion to dismiss, the FTC’s action will proceed to the next phase.  No date has been set yet for trial.  The case is FTC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. C-14-4785 (N.D. Cal.).

Katherine Armstrong, Counsel in our Washington, D.C. office, contributed to this post.

Mark W. Brennan

Mark W. Brennan,

Washington, D.C.

Loading data