We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Proposal by Obama Administration Seeks to Limit U.S. Federal Income Tax Deductions for Reinsurance Premiums Paid by U.S. Cedents to Affiliated Non-U.S. Reinsurers

Christine K. Lane

Christine K. Lane,

Washington, D.C.

Jason Kaplan

Jason Kaplan,

New York

Gene Magidenko

30 June 2015
What is Being Proposed

In an effort to reduce perceived U.S. tax advantages for certain multinational insurance and reinsurance groups with U.S. operations, the Obama administration in its 2016 Fiscal Year Budget Revenue Proposals seeks new legislation that would deny a U.S. cedent a federal income tax deduction for premiums paid to an affiliated non-U.S. reinsurer for the reinsurance of U.S. property and casualty risks. The disallowance of the deduction would apply where the non-U.S. reinsurer is not subject to U.S. federal income tax on the premium income. In addition, the proposal would exclude from a U.S. cedent’s income (in the same proportion that the premium deduction was denied) ceding commissions received, return premiums, reinsurance recovered, or other amounts received with respect to reinsurance policies for which a deduction is either wholly or partially denied.[1]

The proposal would be effective for policies issued in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015, and is estimated to raise approximately $7.4 billion over 10 years.

How the Proposal Impacts Current Law

Current U.S. tax rules permit U.S. cedents a deduction for premiums paid for reinsurance to an affiliated reinsurer regardless of whether the affiliated reinsurer is a U.S. or non-U.S. company. The perceived U.S. tax advantage arises in the multinational group context when the insurance income of a non-U.S. reinsurer is not subject to current U.S. income tax. Reinsurance policies issued by non-U.S. reinsurers with respect to U.S. risks are subject to, and will continue to be subject to, a U.S. federal excise tax equal to one percent of the premiums paid, unless waived by an applicable tax treaty. Because of the disparate imposition of U.S. tax in this context, an incentive exists for U.S. cedents (currently enjoying a U.S. tax benefit in the form of a deduction for premiums paid for reinsurance) to reinsure their U.S. property and casualty risks with non-U.S. reinsurers not subject to U.S. federal income tax (as opposed to reinsuring with domestic affiliates or foreign affiliates whose income is currently subject to U.S. federal income tax).

Observations

While this proposal is similar to previous budget revenue proposals, including the Obama Administration’s 2015 proposals, currently there does not appear to be significant momentum in Congress to further the proposal’s enactment. Nonetheless, multinational insurance and reinsurance groups should be aware of the recent proposal and its potential impact on cross-border reinsurance transactions involving U.S. ceding companies.

********************************

 [1] The proposal would permit the non-U.S. reinsurer to elect to treat the U.S. source premiums paid by the affiliated U.S. cedent (and associated investment income) as income effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business and attributable to a permanent establishment for tax treaty purposes. For foreign tax credit purposes, the income treated as effectively connected would be treated as non-U.S.-source income and placed into a separate category for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Christine K. Lane

Christine K. Lane,

Washington, D.C.

Jason Kaplan

Jason Kaplan,

New York

Gene Magidenko

UK Insurance disruption from the 17th century

The Great Fire of London was finally extinguished 350 years ago today. New insurance structures emerged in the aftermath of the Great Fire – which bear striking resemblance to some of ...

05 September 2016
Loading data