|After the UK Brexit referendum of 23 June the implications on the political, economic and legal relations between the UK and the EU have been discussed from many angles. But what about...|
The European Parliament Votes to Remove Investor-State Arbitration from the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Negotiations
The resolution also calls for transparency in these proceedings, which should be resolved by “publicly appointed, independent professional judges in public hearings". Consistent with a “Concept Paper” previously issued by the European Commission, the European Parliament urges that the TTIP include an appellate mechanism to ensure the consistency of judicial decisions as well as the jurisdiction of courts of the EU and of EU Member States. Finally, the European Parliament calls for limited investment protection provisions covering national treatment, most-favored nation, fair and equitable treatment, and expropriation.
The European Parliament’s resolution marks the culmination of increasingly skeptical views of the EU institutions towards investor-State arbitration. European Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström had previously announced the EU’s new objectives for investment protection in TTIP. On 5 May 2015, these objectives were published in a “Concept Paper” that outlined certain EU priorities in negotiating the TTIP investment chapter. Commissioner Malmström’s objectives were then also endorsed by a resolution of the European Parliament’s Committee on International Trade (INTA Committee) on 28 May 2015. The 8 July 2015 resolution of the European Parliament appears to be based on the European Commission’s Concept Paper to some degree, though it would seem that the European Parliament has even more significant concerns over investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS) than the Commission.
The European Parliament’s vote is yet another challenge to efforts across the Atlantic to negotiate the TTIP, notwithstanding the recent affirmative vote in the U.S. Congress to grant “Trade Promotion Authority” to President Obama. Business groups were particularly disappointed by the European Parliament’s vote, urging both the European Commission and the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) to negotiate a TTIP that will “include an effective ISDS system that protects investors from unjust discrimination and unfair treatment.” The tenth TTIP negotiating round is currently underway, and so next steps on this contentious issue will be a matter of “wait and see.”
Special thanks to Warren Bianchi for his assistance with this blog post.
The Department of Energy (DOE) recently published its revised Part 810 Guidance on compliance with the amended Part 810 Regulations on nuclear export controls (10 C.F.R. Part 810). The 2015 ...24 June 2016
FinCEN Designates North Korea as a Jurisdiction of Primary Money Laundering Concern, Triggering Additional Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions
Pursuant to the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016’s requirement that the Secretary of the Treasury determine whether North Korea is a jurisdiction of...16 June 2016