Supreme Court Declines to Review Appeal by Christian Student Groups
The Ninth Circuit ruling, a unanimous decision by a three-judge panel, had been described as the first major decision to rely on the Supreme Court’s June 2010 ruling in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez. In that case, the Supreme Court rejected claims by the Christian Legal Society at the University of California’s Hastings College of Law that the law school had violated the First Amendment rights of students by denying official recognition and financial support to groups that barred gay students from joining.
The ruling in Christian Legal Society focused on a type of policy often referred to as an “accept all comers” rule, which requires any student group seeking official recognition to accept anyone who wishes to join. The policy in effect at San Diego State University, however, was somewhat different; it prohibited membership restrictions on specific bases, such as race, gender, religion, and sexual orientation. The plaintiffs claimed that the policy allowed for “secular belief-based discrimination while prohibiting religious belief-based discrimination”, according to the Ninth Circuit’s summary of their argument. But the appeals court found no evidence that the school had created the policy to suppress viewpoints. The university was not requiring the Christian groups to accept non-Christian members, the court said; it was only setting conditions for recognition as an official student group.
The U.S. Department of Education and Department of Justice (“Departments”) recently weighed in on the obligations of school districts, colleges, and universities to provide...27 July 2016
China's National People’s Congress passed the Foreign NGO Law today, which will become effective from January 1, 2017. According to the news report on the latest draft, the...28 April 2016