We use cookies to deliver our online services. Details of the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookies Policy. By using this website you agree to our use of cookies. To close this message click close.

Summary and analysis of United States v. Duke Energy Corp. (M.D.N.C. 6 Nov. 2013)

Justin A. Savage

Justin A. Savage,

Washington, D.C.

Mary Anne Sullivan

07 November 2013
Today, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina issued an opinion in United States v. Duke Energy Corp. that will be of interest to clients with fossil fuel-fired electric generating units. This is the case that went to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2006 on the emissions test for “modifications” to existing units under the New Source Review (NSR) permitting program of the Clean Air Act (CAA). After years of litigation in the district court, Judge Osteen issued the attached opinion denying Duke’s motion for summary judgment and Duke’s motion to exclude the opinions of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) experts.
Summary and analysis of United States v. Duke Energy Corp. (M.D.N.C. 6 Nov. 2013)

Read more here.

Justin A. Savage

Justin A. Savage,

Washington, D.C.

Mary Anne Sullivan

Loading data